The Olympus OM-D E-M5 vs. the Fujifilm X-Pro 1. Huh?

The internet is on fire.  Which camera to buy: the Olympus OM-D E-M5 (that’s a mouthful) or the Fujifilm X-Pro 1?  Sure, Canon has released the successor to its ridiculously popular 5D II and Nikon’s newest twins, the D800 and D800E, are all the rage… but why is everyone talking about these two mirrorless cameras, from companies considered much lower than the Big Two on the photographic food chain?

And since we’re asking good questions here, why would anybody think that a compare and contrast exercise between these two system cameras might make any sense at all?  They are, after all, quite radically different from each other.

Conventional wisdom would suggest that each is the latest entrant in the frantic mirrorless race, a competition that has suddenly become interesting.  Canon and Nikon, both fearful of cannibalizing the sales of their main offerings, have treaded lightly in the smaller and lighter camera system arena.  Canon has mostly stayed away, offering only a fixed lens iteration of their venerable G-series, complete with a 4/3-ish sized sensor, and Nikon has offered the 1 Series in two bodies, the J and the V.  These include a sensor that is much smaller than even the micro-4/3 one and though Nikon’s massive distribution machine has helped the 1 achieve respectable sales stature, most photogs I know have shied away.  That leaves room for companies such as Panasonic, Olympus, Sony and Fujifilm to offer up their best to a public that apparently eagerly awaits.  The sales tallys suggest that the smaller and lighter system camera market is important.  And growing rapidly.

Enter the Olympus, modeled after the company’s one-time hit, the OM film cameras.  Fujifilm has followed the success of its X100 with an interchangeable X-Pro series.  The web forums are alive with discussion: which camera would you chose and why?

2 Guys Photo is going to try to answer that question and user reports for both systems will follow.  But that’s not the point of this post.

I believe that the distinction has more to do with the manner in which each camera allows you to shoot… and I think that’s the real question here.

Which reminds me of what happened to me twenty years ago this past week.  Playing competitive basketball landed me in a hospital emergency room, having fallen on both of my hands.  My left hand was described as having a “broken hinge” and a shattered scaphoid bone.  Think about the worst thing you can do to your wrist and… that’s just about what happened.  My right hand suffered a thumb relocation and damaged joint socket.  Eight hours of surgery later, I emerged with two hands in casts.  Side note: you’ll never believe what you can learn to do without the use of your hands.

During the recovery process, when I was struggling to rehab some of the most basic functions, including writing, my hand surgeon suggested I try using a fountain pen.  It requires far less pressure on the pen to work and the angle of writing is completely different.  Over time, I learned to prefer using fountain pens to conventional ballpoint pens.  Sure, the ink supply doesn’t last very long.  They sometimes clog and leak.  And they can be more expensive to use.  But fountain pens force me to slow down my writing pace, which helps me to write more precisely, more effectively.

The appeal of the X-Pro 1, to me, is very similar to the experience of using a fountain pen.  It demands a slower pace, a more deliberate style of shooting.  The OM-D is far more versatile, durable, and flexible.  It’s the ballpoint pen of cameras.

Which style of writing… er, shooting… do you prefer?

Stay tuned and I’ll let you know what I think of both systems.

This entry was posted in Gear & accessories and tagged , . Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to The Olympus OM-D E-M5 vs. the Fujifilm X-Pro 1. Huh?

  1. DGuidas says:

    I like both “styles” of camera and my photography would probably look the same with either one since I generally shoot stationary objects. Although I’m a fan of old school style function it can be frustrating at times when I am trying to work quick.But that’s not always a good thing, and the forced slower pace could result in a more methodical way of shooting which may yield better results. Regardless, I have to lean towards the Olympus because you can work quick or slow down when the mood hits.

  2. rdungan1918 says:

    I love all the hype about the latest and greatest camera. But its mostly hype. I have two digital cameras, a Cannon S95 (pocket camera) and a Nikon D7000 (DSLR) with three lenses. Unless they come out with something completely revolutionary, I plan to stay with these. If I do my part they take great images. What I really need to work on is my part, of the picture taking equation. Buying a new camera will not automatically improve the images you take.

    • Rey says:

      “Buying a new camera will not automatically improve the images you take.”

      I’m certain you’re right and I’m sure my brother will agree as that’s his philosophy to a T.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s